Nixon v. City of Anniston
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The testimony tends to show that in 1884, the Woodstock Iron Company as owner of the land had a map made showing lots and streets. On June 3, 1884, this company conveyed a lot to one Todd, described as being lot 6, block 222, on map of town of Anniston. No other map is shown to have been in existence at the time of this deed. This map was not recorded nor produced at the trial, hut was shown to have been lost. The Woodstock Iron Company was succeeded by the Anniston City Land Company. On February 22, 1889, this company made a map covering the same land, acknowledged it, and it was duly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Manning v. HouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Highland Realty Co. v. Avondale Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Louisville & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- City of Mobile v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- City of Prichard v. GearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Thomas v. City of RainsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Jefferson County v. McClintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Kadlec v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.