Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Brigham City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1966No. 10404PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice:

Brigham City, a municipal corporation, appeals from a judgment enjoining it from diverting surface and percolating waters from Brigham City by means of man-made storm and drainage systems away from the natural drainage system for such waters and dumping them into respondent Frank O. Reeder’s private irrigation system. Brigham City also appeals from the judgment for damages in the amount of $1.00 plus costs of suit awarded respondent.

It is appellant’s contention that the court erred in granting damages because any action of the City was in its governmental capacity and therefore…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cobia v. Roy CityUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jergens v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanford v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Provo City Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hardy Salt Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Hardy Salt Company v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  5. Sanford v. University of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API