Legal Opinion

Scheide v. Porstmann

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 10, 1945No. 2498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiffs as tenants are suing the defendants, as landlords, for treble damages for an alleged overcharge for rent. The suit is based on the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq. The authority given for the particular suit is to be found in section 925(e).

On October 23, 1942, the landlords, by a written instrument, leased to the tenants “four and one-half acres, improved with an eight-room cottage known as Horn Road, Perry Hall, Md.”, for the period of one year beginning on the first day of November 1942, and ending on the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Bowles v. Farmers Nat. Bank of Lebanon, Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. FiskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Woods v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API