Legal Opinion

Mather-James Co., Inc. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 6, 1934No. 13825PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

This is an action in claim and delivery brought by Mather-James Company against Nezzia Wilson and James T. Love, defendants, on April 20, 1932. Mr. Love was made a party for the reason that he, as landlord, claimed some interest in the property involved in the suit. His interest will fully appear later in this opinion.

The defendant Wilson defaulted and, hence, passes out of consideration in this appeal.

The cause was tried before Hon. M. F. Ansel, Judge of the Greenville County Court, without a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust & Mortgage Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Ex Parte Benjamin Harris Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Brunswick Corporation, and Floyd Corporation, D/B/A Pleasant Lanes v. J. C. Long, Alberta S. Long, and the Beach Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  3. Francis H. Leggett & Co. v. Orangeburg Piggly Wiggly Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API