South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens' Bank
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Concurrence
I do not see how it is possible to escape the conclusion reached in the opinion of Mr. Acting Justice Cothran, unless the Court expressly overrules the holdings of a majority of the Court in the case of Ex parte Sanders, 168 S.C. 323,167 S.E., 154, which have been followed in the two later cases of Exparte Town of Darlington, 168 S.C. 242, 167 S.E., 412, and In re Loan Savings Bank, 170 S.C. 388,170 S.E., 474. I did not agree with the majority in the Sanders case, but I have yielded to that case as authority since its decision, as will be seen from the reports of the other cited cases.
Matters…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Ex Parte Town of DarlingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Mather-James Co., Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- In Re: Loan Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933