Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Palmerton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1983No. 80-0039-NJ-1; CA A25720PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Wife appeals a decree of dissolution entered on remand following wife’s earlier appeal. 56 Or App 105, 641 P2d 81 (1982). She contends that the court erred in not dividing the marital property equally, in failing to award spousal support and in not disqualifying itself from hearing the case on remand.

The facts developed at the first trial are adequately related in our prior opinion. In that opinion we noted that there was a mention of husband’s Teamster pension rights but no evidence developed as to the value of the pension or husband’s entitlement upon retirement. We also expressed concern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In re the Marriage of SlausonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. In re the Marriage of PalmertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Matter of Marriage of TibblesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API