State v. Michael L. Cox
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Kelly, J.
*781 *340 ¶ 1 Upon conviction of a felony, our statutes provide for imposition of a $250 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis surcharge on the defendant. Before the legislature adopted 2013 Wis. Act 20 (Act 20), the relevant statute said the court "may" impose that surcharge. Now, however, the statute says the court "shall" impose the surcharge. The court of appeals certified Mr. Michael L. Cox's appeal to us so that we may determine whether the substitution of *341 "shall" for "may" means that circuit courts no longer have the discretion to waive the surcharge. We conclude that Act 20 eliminated that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Richards v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quick Charge Kiosk LLC v. Josh KaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Anthony M. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. Anthony M. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Douglas Oitzinger v. City of MarinetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
- Jay Stone v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.