Legal Opinion

Mancini v. EDS ON BEHALF OF THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 14, 1993PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, Justice.

This appeal involves a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Mary Jane Mancini and her husband, Anthony Maneini, against defendant, Electronic Data Systems Corporation (EDS), a servicing carrier of the New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association, commonly known as the Joint Underwriting Association or JUA. The Law Division denied EDS’s motion to vacate the default judgment and its motion to reconsider that judgment. In an unreported decision, the Appellate Division affirmed. We granted defendant’s petition…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baumann v. MarinaroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Marder v. Realty Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  4. Hodgson v. ApplegateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Court Investment Co. v. PerilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF TOWN OF MORRISTOWN v. LittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. AngelesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & CieslaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API