Legal Opinion

Knurr v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, No. 121PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Edward J. Knorr, appellant, instituted an action in assumpsit .against Commercial Casualty Insurance Company, appellee, to recover $1,197.45, representing fees and expenses which he incurred in successfully defending a damage suit by a patron injured in his beauty shop when a mechanical hair dryer struck her on the head. Plaintiff alleged that his contract of insurance with the defendant company required it to defend suits arising from injuries of the type involved in this case. Defendant company claimed that by an endorsement on the policy such risk was excluded and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferry v. Protective Indemnity Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Bubb v. Parker & Edwards Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Biborosch v. Transamerica InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Visiting Nurse Association of Greater Philadelphia v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Visiting Nurse Association of Greater Philadelphia v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. Visiting Nurse Association of Greater Philadelphia ("Vna")Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Gulf Insurance Co. v. Gold Cross Ambulance Service Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Antles v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API