Legal Opinion

Rogers v. National Calendar & Advertising Novelty Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 16, 1911No. 18,451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Action by J. Earl Rogers against the National Calendar & Advertising Novelty Company and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

On the threshhold of this case, defendants and appellees suggest that the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction ratione materise.

Plaintiff enjoined the defendants from carrying on their business in the name of the J. Earl Rogers Company, or using such name in any manner in their business, in violation of the letter and spirit of a written agreement between the parties. The petition shows that the letter of the contract was complied with, and that the complaint is based on allegations that a salesman of the defendants had in March, 1908, solicited and taken eight orders in the name of the J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lea v. OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  2. Quaglino v. CurrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spearing v. Whitney-Central Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Fontenot v. LaudeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Sturm v. HutchinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Olmedo v. RomeroDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API