Legal Opinion

Hill v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1978No. Appeal, No. 2331 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

James Hill has appealed a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming a referee’s order denying him compensation. Hill was declared ineligible for having voluntarily left his work without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Section 102(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of Decern*254her 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b)(l).

Hill was employed by tbe United States as a pipe-fitter at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard from April 3,1973 until July 31, 1975. Hill resigned on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rizzitano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Kozlowski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Barrett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Volk v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Garvin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fishel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. DeMeno v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Panczak v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Scott v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Small v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API