Risher v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The claimant appealed to the superior court from a determination of the board of industrial insurance appeals that he was not a “workman” within the purview of the workmen’s compensation act at the time he sustained certain injuries, and, hence, not entitled to any benefit thereunder. The superior court reached the same conclusion as the board, and dismissed his appeal. From the order of dismissal he has appealed to this court.
A “workman” under that act is defined by RCW 51.08.180, which reads as follows:
“ Workman.’ Workman’ means every person in this state who is engaged in the employment of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burchett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- White v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Clausen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Hinds v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Dieckman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Affordable Cabs, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Western Ports v. Employment SEC. Dept.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Western Ports Transportation, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Jerome v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Riverview Health Care v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.