Legal Opinion

Cimarron Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McKnight

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1992No. 76086PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUNTER, Judge:

Appellant, Cimarron, appeals from an adverse judgment following trial. The trial court held that Appellee-Borrowers, Gary McKnight and Denny Davidson, were not personally liable for the unpaid balance of a Note Cimarron owed. The unpaid balance of the Note at the time of trial was $287,013.11. Borrowers, McKnight and Davidson, are the only Appellees involved in this appeal. The other Appellees have no personal liability on the Note. Andrea Lou McKnight and Peggy Davidson are parties only because they signed the mortgage that secured the Note. McKnight Realty Company and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. I. David Porras, A/K/A David C. Porras, and William H. Edmiston, Intervening v. Petroplex Savings Association, Olney Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. NemecekDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. O'MalleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. O'MalleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Prudential Insruance Co. of America v. Allied Tower, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Prudential Insruance Co. of America v. Allied Tower, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API