Legal Opinion

O'Doherty v. Toole

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1887No. Civil No. 191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a Judgment of the County Court in and for the County of Pima. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, C. J.

The main questions raised by the record in this case are: (1) Had the appellant and creditor, under the general law, the right to pursue the property fraudulently conveyed by the debtor, in the hands of the vendee, without joining the executor of the deceased debtor? (2) If so, has the law of this territory contravened that right, or by it is the debt barred and the right lost, because the claim was not presented for allowance in the probate court within the 10 months allowed by said law?

John O’Doherty, the appellant and creditor, had recovered judgment against James H. Toole, the husband of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fallon v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Merry v. FremonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Pitte v. ShipleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Zoll v. SoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Freeman v. Wintroath Pumps—Division of Worthington Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Ferguson v. RobertsArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Stephenson v. LichtensteinWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Van Zandt v. ChanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API