Legal Opinion
In Re Dienberg
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided August 30, 2006No. 19-20364PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED DECISION
ROBERT E. GRANT, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the court with regard to the issues raised by a motion for an order confirming the termination of the automatic stay, filed on behalf of Daimler-Chrysler Financial Services. Such orders are a new feature of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 scattered a number of provisions throughout the Bankruptcy Code which state that the automatic stay is terminated, and property may also cease to be property of the bankruptcy estate, without any order of the court upon the occurrence (or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Darlene Jenkins v. George W. Heintz and Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & McPheeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re SteinhausUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2006
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- In Re SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In Re ConleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- In Re GrossiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007