Legal Opinion
In re Sinclair
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided February 14, 2017No. Case No. 14-91565-E-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION SUSTAINING BIFURCATED OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF EXEMPTION
Ronald H. Sargis, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court
Gary Farrar, the Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”) filed an Amended Bifurcated *555Objection to Claim of Exemption (“Bifurcated Objection”) pursuant to the order of this court on the first Objection to Claim of Exemption. Order, Dckt. 457; Civil Minutes Dckt. 455. The Trustee objects to the “Personal Injury” exemption claimed in a “malicious prosecution suit” under California Code of Civil Procedure § 704.140 filed by Riehard Sinclair (“Debtor”).1
Trustee notes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Schwab v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Childs v. GladstoneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Childs v. GladstoneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- In re: Kenneth Gene WilkinsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2025