Legal Opinion

Staten v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1930No. 20102, 20123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

1. A judgment de bonis testatoris against an executor or administrator who fails to plead a want of assets conclusively establishes, as against him, a sufficiency of assets to pay the debt upon which the judgment was rendered. Whiddon v. Williams, 98 Ga. 310 (24 S. E. 437); Gibson v. Robinson, 90 Ga. 756 (2) (16 S. E. 969, 35 Am. St. R. 250). And in a personal suit against the administrator upon such a judgment, suggesting a devastavit, the defendant will not be permitted to collaterally attack the judgment. Porter v. Rountree, 111 Ga. 369 (36 S. E. 761); Bynum v. Bell, 18 Ga. App. 384 (89 S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Porter v. RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Whiddon v. Williams & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Bynum v. Bell & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Cox v. StatenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanby v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Steinberg v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Steinberg v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API