Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Freedman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1938No. 11842PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

This case is before this court on certiorari. The facts sufficiently appear in the report of the decision under review. 55 Ga. App. 298 (190 S. E. 187).

1. Under the facts of the case, the judgment against the executrix in her representative capacity was conclusive upon her as to the sufficiency of assets to pay the debt. Gibson v. Robinson, 90 Ga. 756 (2) (16 S. E. 969, 35 Am. St. R. 250); Porter v. Rountree, 111 Ga. 369 (36 S. E. 761); Staten v. Cox, 41 Ga. App. 763 (154 S. E. 721).

2. In the present later suit by the creditor, based upon such judgment, to recover a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thornton v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Gibson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Porter v. RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Groves v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  5. King v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raines v. ShipleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API