Legal Opinion

People v. Redmond

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 2018No. 1-15-1188UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

¶ 1 Defendant Carl Redmond, arrested and charged in a domestic battery case for the third time, argues that his conviction should be overturned because the trial court failed to adequately warn him about proceeding without an attorney. After rejecting the services of at least six attorneys over a 17-month period and after being encouraged by the trial judge a dozen times to accept the services of an attorney, defendant indicated that he wanted to proceed pro se . He was tried by a jury, found guilty, and sentenced to 364 days in jail.

¶ 2 Now, defendant argues for the first time that his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. PiatkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. HaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. ReddIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. BaezIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RedmondAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API