Legal Opinion

Marroquin v. D & N FUNDING, INC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 13, 1997No. 13-96-292-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal. Appellants, Maria Marroquin and Valentin Marro-quin, sought to enjoin appellee, D & N Funding, Inc., from proceeding with an action to evict them from their home. After a hearing on the matter, the trial court denied appellants’ request for a temporary injunction. By two points of error, appellants contend that the trial court erred in denying the requested temporary injunction. We affirm.

Under Texas procedure, appeals are allowed only from final orders or judgments. Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. A.H. Robins Co. v. PiccininCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. In the Matter of S.I. Acquisition, Inc., Debtor. S.I. Acquisition, Inc. v. Eastway Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Yarto v. Gilliland, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  2. Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. Yarto International Group, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
  3. Houston Pipeline Co. v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Superpumper, Inc. v. Nerland Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bamburg v. Townsend, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API