Legal Opinion

Dudek v. Bigley

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided December 6, 1977No. 31-A of 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, P. J.,

Plaintiffs reside on Lapin Lane Extension and Maureen Lane in Pulaski Township. Their properties are part of the Bigley Plan of Lots which was developed by defendants. Plaintiffs all purchased their land from defendants within the past seven years and built new homes thereon.

Unfortunately, these homes lack some of the conveniences they expected. The mail is not delivered to their houses. No school bus travels these roads to pick up their children. When much snow is on the ground, these roads are not opened by the township for travel. During the balance of the year, these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brodt v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Scientific Living, Inc. v. HohenseeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Drew v. WiswallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Pollyanna Homes, Inc. v. BerneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bird Lakes Dev. v. MerueloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API