Legal Opinion
Bebchick v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 7, 1986No. Nos. 23720, 23747 and 74-2056PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
This old case is before us, once more,1 this time for disposition of issues arising from the respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission’s (Commission or WMATC) Report of Findings and Recommendations Bebchick III, Phase One,2 on remand from this court’s decision in Bebchick v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm’n, 645 F.2d 1086 (D.C.Cir.1981) (Bebchick III). We have also to determine an attorneys’ fee award for counsel for the Bebchick group (Bebchick).3
I
The facts surrounding this litigation have been discussed in detail in prior decisions of this…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Leonard N. Bebchick v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, Leonard N. Bebchick, Intervenors. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Guillemard-Ginorio v. ContrerasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988