Friedman v. City of Chicago Department of Business & Consumer Protection
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge
Plaintiffs have brought this action, purportedly on behalf of various taxicab medallion owners, licensed managers of taxicab medallions and taxicab affiliations that own or manage wheelchair accessible vehicle (“WAV”) medallions, against Defendants,1 seeking monetary damages and in-junctive relief against the enforcement of recent regulations and fees. In their Complaint, Plaintiffs assert Constitutional violations of the Contracts Clause (Count I), the Commerce Clause (Count III), and the Privileges and Immunities…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anita Christensen and Robert Alty v. County of Boone, Illinois, and Edward KriegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.