Legal Opinion

Cleaveland v. Mullin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 31, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Baltimore City Court (Dennis, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the receiver of the Atlantic Trust and Deposit Company of Baltimore-against the appellant to re- ■ cover the amount of an alleged subscription by the latter to the capital stock of the company. The declaration contains the üsual money counts and a special count which sets forth the contract sued on. Eleven pleas were filed. Upon some’ issues were joined and to others demurrers were interposed.' The demurrers were sustained and the case went to trial on. the issues of fact made by the other pleas. - During the progress of the trial eight exceptions. were reserved.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Hughes v. Antietam Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. Taggart v. Western Maryland Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  4. Bonaparte v. Baltimore, Hampden & Lake Roland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Franklin Fire Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cranson v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Grossfield v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Murphy v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Murphy v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. National Shutter Bar Co. v. Zimmerman & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API