First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Sioux Falls v. Union Bank & Trust
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceParker, Circuit Judge
I concur in the result of the majority decision, but differ on the question of whether this is a case for the application of SDCL 57-13-13 (UCC 3-406) for the reasons hereinafter set forth.
APPLICATION OF UCC 3-406
The threshold question in evaluating First Federal’s first theory of Recovery is whether the drawer’s signatures were “authorized” or “unauthorized.” If “unauthorized” then the case will be governed by SDCL 57-13-13 (UCC 3-406), as urged by the Bank, rather than the common-law rule urged by First Federal.
“Unauthorized signature” is defined by the Code as “one made without actual,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Carlsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Baldwin Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1963
- People v. GiguiereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958