Legal Opinion

Bell v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1903No. 13,214PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Ness district court; Chas. E. Lobdell, judge.

1Per curiam

Defendants’ depositions were quashed on motion of plaintiffs. Application was then made by defendants for a continuance of the case, and an affidavit showing diligence filed.’ As showing the meritorious character of the evidence which they expected to produce, the defendants attached to and made a part of their affidavit the depositions which had been quashed. The plaintiffs elected to admit the affidavit and go to trial. They objected to the reading of the depositions as part of the affidavit. The court permitted their reading, and this is alleged as error. We think the court was right. The…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Alexander v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. TaplinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  4. Chesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. State v. ChoquetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API