Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Foreman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1913No. Gen. No. 19,030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo Pam, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court directing the issuance of a writ of mandamus, commanding appellants, who constitute the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the city of Chicago, to place the name of appellee, as guardian of Bernice Gibbons, a minor, upon the police pension fund rolls of the city of Chicago, in order that she may receive “all pension moneys due her as such guardian under the terms and provisions of the police pension fund act as amended.” To the petition for mandamus, appellants filed a general demurrer, which was overruled. They elected to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sewall v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Keegan v. GeraghtyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Plaster v. PlasterIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Eddy v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Flannigan v. HowardIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Escartín Viuda de Quiñones v. HitchmanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
  2. Dwyer v. DwyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. People v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  4. Escartín de Quiñones v. HitchmanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API