Burton v. Delaware Poultry Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Speakman, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
In support of its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto the defendant’s argument is directed exclusively to the contention that it appears from the evidence that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.
In Freeman on Judgments, 5th Ed., Sec. 20, there appears the following comments concerning such a judgment, with numerous authorities cited in support thereof:
“It can be entered only on the application of the plaintiff, made after the verdict and before the entry of judgment thereon. The defendant was not, at the common law, entitled to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lebanon & Nashville Turnpike Co. v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Citizens Trust Co. v. Service Motor Car Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Weis-Patterson Lumber Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Snyder v. ElkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crouse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955