Legal Opinion
Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 21, 2001No. 00-1162PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellants Richard Bartell and his wife filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against his former employer, defendant-appellee Aurora Public Schools (“APS”), alleging violations of his due process and equal protection rights, as well as pendent state law claims, stemming from APS’s investigation of sexual harassment charges against Bartell. The district court granted summary judgment for APS in all respects. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
Bartell worked at APS from January 1977 to July 1997, serving as a Supervisor of Environmental…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Brown v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Jennings v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Powers v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Burnham v. Humphrey Hospitality Reit Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Racine Charter One, Inc. D/B/A 21st Century Preparatory School, Christine Hauck, and Sherry James v. Racine Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.