Legal Opinion

Humphreys-Mexia Oil Co. v. Arsenaux

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1922No. 8821. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of error granted December 6, 1922. On October 15, 1921, appellant, in compliance with the provisions of chapter 88 of the General Laws of Texas enacted by the Thirty-Fifth Legislature (Vernon's Ann.Civ.St.Supp. 1918, arts. 4991-5011 1/2W) obtained a permit from the board of water engineers to construct a dam across the Navasota river in Limestone county, Tex., for the purpose of appropriating what is denominated in the permit as public waters of the state of Texas. The permit authorized the use of the storm waters and the flood waters of the river. Appellant constructed a dam in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watkins Land Co. v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Board of Water Engineers v. McKnightTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Baker, Fleming & Hubert v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Boyd v. MotlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. ArseneauxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wallace Investments, Inc. v. BlackstockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. City of Independence Ex Rel. Flournoy v. DickinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API