Legal Opinion

Chancey v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1892No. 8153PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

— The land in controversy was originally sold by the Land Board to Owen Shriver, in November, 1886, and the State of Texas brought this action to recover the land on account of an alleged failure on the part of Shriver or persons claiming through him to comply with the terms of his purchase.

Shriver’s application for the land was as follows:

“To Secretary State Land Board:
“I hereby apply to purchase under regulations of the State Land Board, adopted May 2,1885, the following land, situated in Hardeman County, viz., Section 280, block H, Waco & Northwestern Railway Company…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smisson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State v. OppermanTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Taylor v. BurkeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Coleman & Nelson v. LordTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. King v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ruben Aleman, M.D. v. Texas Medical BoardTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Sutherland v. FriedenbloomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Walraven v. Farmers & Merchants National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Schwarz v. McCallTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Morgan v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API