Legal Opinion

Claim of Sanchez v. Clestra Cleanroom, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mercure, J.P.

Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 24, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that the Board possessed jurisdiction over claimant’s application for benefits, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed January 9, 2004, which denied the employer’s application for reconsideration and/or full Board review.

*782Claimant, a resident of Georgia, was hired in September 1999 by Clestra Cleanroom, Inc., a New York corporation, to supervise a construction project in Argentina. The employment contract was prepared, agreed to and executed via mail and facsimile…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Nashko v. Standard Water Proofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Assessor of CatskillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Claim of Hartham v. George A. Fuller Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Claim of Palagurchi v. Mengs Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Claim of Marzena Bugaj v. Great American Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Claim of Deraway v. Bulk Storage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Graham v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Colley v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Matter of Barnett v. CallawayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API