Denig v. Seelig

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of services as the result of the collision between two automobiles, in one of which (owned and operated by the defendants Seelig) the infant plaintiff was a passenger, the defendants Reed and Hart, the operator and owner, respectively, of the other automobile, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 24, 1962, as denied their motion to file a jury demand nun o pro tuno, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 426 of the Civil Practice Act. The defendants Seelig also…