Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chase v. Scalici

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1983Published

1Dissent

Weinstein, J. (dissenting).

I would affirm the order of the Appellate Term.

Notwithstanding the sound legal reasoning expressed by my learned colleagues in the majority opinion, I am compelled to reach a contrary conclusion in view of the peculiar circumstances of this case. The commencement of separate actions for the recovery of attorney’s fees, the ordering of a joint trial of two actions, without consolidation, before a single arbitrator and the rendition of two separate awards, one in favor of plaintiff and one in favor of defendant, created a situation which was confusing at best.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New York Investors, Inc. v. Laurelton Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Chemical Bank v. 1364 Dean Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Parker, Clark Associates, Inc. v. ESM Data Systems, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. Denig v. SeeligAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Watson v. JarvisCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API