United States v. Villafranco
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, Judge.
On 7/29/97, this Court denied as untimely the Government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce Carlos Villafraneo’s sentence. That Rule provides that the Government must move for a reduction of sentence “within one year after the imposition of the sentence.” Id. Indeed, only if the Government demonstrates that the defendant provided “substantial assistance” “involv[ing] information or evidence not known by the defendant until more than one year after imposition of sentence” can a court even consider an otherwise untimely motion. Id. (emphasis added); United States v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Raynard McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999
- United States v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000