Legal Opinion

United States v. Villafranco

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided August 11, 1997No. CR 495-094-013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, Judge.

On 7/29/97, this Court denied as untimely the Government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce Carlos Villafraneo’s sentence. That Rule provides that the Government must move for a reduction of sentence “within one year after the imposition of the sentence.” Id. Indeed, only if the Government demonstrates that the defendant provided “substantial assistance” “involv[ing] information or evidence not known by the defendant until more than one year after imposition of sentence” can a court even consider an otherwise untimely motion. Id. (emphasis added); United States v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Raynard McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999
  2. United States v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API