Legal Opinion
United States v. Doe
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 19, 1999No. 96-CR-19PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COLLIER, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Government’s Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Court File No. 36) and Defendant John Doe’s Memorandum in Support of the Government’s Motion (Court File No. 38). The Government did not file a brief in support of its Motion. For the following reasons, the Court will DENY the Government’s Motion.
I. RELEVANT FACTS
On April 15, 1996, Defendant John Doe pleaded guilty to a one count indictment charging him with possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (crack) in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Raynard McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. OrozcoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Ricardo George Carey, A/K/A Ricki, A/K/A Ruboy, A/K/A Ron Smith, United States of America v. Anthony StreetCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. VillafrancoDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- United States v. DewesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- United States v. PerkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001