Legal Opinion

Ashland Oil & Refining Co. v. Hooker Chemical Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 14, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 3838PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WEINMAN, Chief Judge.

This cause came on to be considered upon the motion of the defendant, Hooker Chemical Corp., consisting of two branches as follows:

Branch I of said motion requests the Court to dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure of plaintiff to comply with Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In the event that Branch I of said motion is Denied, then and in the alternative Branch II of said motion requests the Court to stay the proceedings in this action pending the outcome of Case No. *51370-C-1628 brought by Hooker Chemical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barber-Greene Company v. Blaw-Knox Company and All Purpose Spreader CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  2. Heijher v. Erie Railroad Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  2. School Committee v. DupreyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. H. Alpers & Associates v. Omega Precision Hand Tools, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Housworth v. GlissonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
  5. Boykin v. Commerce Union BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API