Legal Opinion

Panaview Door & Window Co., a Corporation v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1958No. 15059PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

This diversity suit involves the asserted improper use by Reynolds Metals Company of dies alleged to have been made solely for Panaview Door & Window Co. In three causes of action, alternatively pleading breach of contract, violation of a confidential relationship, and unfair competition, Panaview sought damages and injunctive relief.

After a non jury trial, judgment was entered for defendant. On this appeal, Panaview questions the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court concerning each of the causes of action.

Panaview is engaged in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Heath v. HelmickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  4. City of Harlan, Iowa v. Duncan Parking Meter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Don Kirshner, and Schumaier, Roberts & McKinsey v. Uniden Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. United States v. Michael Edward KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Patrick Russell v. Jocelyn LumitapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. Summerlin v. BowdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API