Legal Opinion

MARCOS LOMELI v. PFEIFFER, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 23, 2026No. 1:22-cv-00079Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCOS LOMELI, Case No. 1:22-cv-00079-KES-FJS (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY 13 v. (ECF No. 36) 14 PFEIFFER, et al., ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE STATUS REPORTS REGARDING 15 Defendants. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 16 NINETY (90) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Marcos Lomeli (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 20 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended 21 complaint against Defendants…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API