United States v. Larson

OPINION OF THE COURT

MATHEWS, Judge:

The appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of one specification each of attempted carnal knowledge and attempted indecent acts with a minor, both in violation of Article 80, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 880; one specification of violating a lawful general regulation, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892; and one specification each of communicating indecent language and using a facility or means of interstate commerce to attempt to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity,1 both in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. A panel of…