Legal Opinion
City of Boise v. Bench Sewer District
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1989No. 16787PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1988 OPINION NO. 122, ISSUED DECEMBER 28, 1988, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN AND THIS OPINION IS SUBSTITUTED THEREFOR.
Before BAKES, Acting C.J., BISTLINE and HUNTLEY, JJ., and McFADDEN and BURNETT, JJ. Pro Tem. PER CURIAM.
This is a contract case. It illustrates the truism that when two parties enter a contract, they chart a mutual course of action, implicitly choosing the security of a planned future over the risk that events may cause the plan to become undesirable for one party or the other. Today we must decide whether such a contract between the City of Boise and the Bench Sewer District should be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Clyde Hess Distributing Co. v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Greening v. BartholfIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Quintana v. AnthonyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Chandler v. HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- DBSI/TRI v. v. BenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. KuenzliIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Haessly v. Safeco Title InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.