Century Indemnity Co. v. Aero-Motive Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
This case involves a dispute regarding insurance coverage for environmental damage. The insurers (collectively “Insurers”), Century Indemnity Company (“Century”), One Beacon Insurance Company (“One Beacon”), and Continental Insurance (“Continental”), filed claims seeking declarations that they are not obligated to Defendants (collectively “Aero”) under certain policies the Insurers issued and that they are not obligated to satisfy a consent judgment (the “Consent Judgment”) Defendants entered into. Presently before the Court are several motions for summary…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Bristol West Insurance v. WhittDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
- Wolverine World Wide, Inc. v. American Insurance Company, TheDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021