Legal Opinion
Deatrick v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 1979No. 2-1077A398PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Deatrick was tried by a jury and convicted of Robbery. We reverse for the reason that he was denied a fair trial.
Deatrick’s Motion to Correct Errors alleges that Paul Shock, an accomplice, “testified on behalf of the State pursuant to an agreement with, consideration from, influence from . . . the then Prosecuting Attorney, Joseph Lesh.” The accompanying affidavit from Paul Shock may be paraphrased as follows:(1) During a meeting with the Prosecutor, Shock offered his testimony in return for a reduction in the ten-year sentence he was presently serving, 1 as well as reductions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aubrey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Long v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Anthony D. Moore v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.