Legal Opinion

State v. Ludlam

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 1938No. 14796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The respondent was arrested on a warrant issued by Magistrate W. A. Gunter, issued under Section 1171 of the Criminal Code, which charged him with obtaining money under false pretenses. When the case was called for trial before the magistrate, the attorney for the prosecution moved to amend the warrant by charging the defendant with breach of trust with fraudulent intent, under Section 1149 of the Criminal Code.

The amount so alleged to have been obtained by the defendant was four and 25/100 dollars. The amendment was allowed. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LynnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. IveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. State v. BelvisoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. City of Spartanburg v. WintersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API