Childress v. Younger
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Appellee, by his amended bill, sought an accounting against appellant, Childress, and another coadventurer, Bain, of a joint enterprise coexisting between the three. The trial court held the bill well proven and Childress has appealed. No question .is argued relative to the sufficiency of the bill, so we lay that to one side.
New principles of law need be cited. The argument is addressed to the propriety of the lower court’s decision on the facts. The hearing was in open court before the judge, so we review the findings with the usual favorable presumption attending. On this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonough v. SaundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Peoples v. SeamonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Brewer v. EwartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Hunter v. ParkmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Lindsey v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tate v. BallardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Childress v. YoungerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952