Legal Opinion
Lindhurst v. City of Berkeley
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 7, 2024No. 4:23-cv-04513Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRIAN LINDHURST, Case No. 23-cv-04513-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF BERKELEY’S MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS AND ITS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 10 CITY OF BERKELEY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 15 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant City of Berkeley’s motion to dismiss and its 14 associated request for judicial notice. Dkt. Nos. 14, 15. The Court finds this matter appropriate 15 for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 16 For the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.