154 East Park Avenue Corp. v. City of Long Beach
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division appealed from, and prior order of the Appellate Division brought up for review, should be affirmed, with costs.
Although it is established on this record that the respondents’ revocation of the building permit was erroneous, the Appellate Division nonetheless was correct in rejecting plaintiffs’ claim for damages. The revocation was a discretionary act for which neither the municipality nor the building inspector will be held liable (Rottkamp v Young, 21 AD2d 373, affd 15 NY2d 831).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Rottkamp v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Sinhogar v. ParryNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Montano v. City of WatervlietAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Koehler v. Town of SmithtownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Flacke v. Salem Hills Sewage Disposal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.