People v. Koontz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Defendant was charged in two counts with violations of Penal Code, sections 288 and 285, lewd conduct with a child and incest. He was found guilty of incest and not guilty on the other count.
Appellant’s daughter, then 13, testified that appellant met her and her twin brother on the street and took them to his apartment where, after sending the brother out to buy cookies, he had an act of sexual intercourse with her. Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that there was not sufficient evidence of sexual penetration.
On direct examination the little girl, not in answer to leading questions,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. HaywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. McGaughranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. BeemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. HortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. PikeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.