Legal Opinion

Maltby v. Thiel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The defendants Mafit and his insurer have not appealed, and have raised no issue as to the plaintiff’s judgment against them. The plaintiffs are content with their judgment against Mafit and his insurer, and are not contesting the appellants’ claims. Thus the only issues are between the defendants Thiel and Mafit and their respective insurers. These issues are whether on the preceding statement of facts the trial judge was justified, (1) in changing the finding of the jury that Thiel was negligent as to control of his car (b) and as to being on the wrong side of the road (c) ; (2) whether, on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Poneitowcki v. HarresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pecor v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Wintersberger v. Pioneer Iron & Metal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Zeinemann v. GasserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Coenen v. Van HandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Poole v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API