Legal Opinion

Doyle v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 10, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

The judgment herein has heretofore been affirmed by this court. The plaintiff now seeks leave to reargue. He raises no new point and does not claim that any point originally made was overlooked by the court but merely urges that the decision made was erroneous.

*504The judgment of the trial court, finding for the defendant and dismissing the complaint, could properly be sustained upon the facts as they were found below. There is, however, another ground upon which we think the affirmance also could be predicated; and as we have been advised that there are pending a number of other cases involving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. McCunney v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wood v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Manning v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  3. Maystrik v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API